Journey Financial helps you with retirement planning, college savings, estate planning, tax planning, investments

Serving Boston, Concord, Carlisle,
Acton, Bedford, Burlington, Lexington, Lincoln, Maynard, Waltham, Westford
in MetroWest Massachuset
ts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

Journey Financial Blog

Archive for February, 2010

Homework for Hiring a Broker

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

NYT February 18, 2010

“…

Another aspect of evaluating brokers is to ask about their compensation. If broker-dealers or certified planners earn commissions for selling certain products, can they provide unbiased investment advice? For example, the typical commission on a $100,000 variable annuity is $6,000, plus $2,000 in annual expenses, which flow back to the agent, insurer and investment manager.

To better understand brokers’ motivations, examine their registration and compensation. Professionals with “Series 6” registrations, for example, can sell only mutual funds and annuities. They must pass a 100-question, multiple-choice exam for this designation. A much broader registration is “Series 7,” which allows sale of all securities and some insurance products.

Fee-only financial planners, in contrast, do not earn commissions; they may pick products that fit your financial needs and goals, at the lowest possible cost. These planners charge for their time and expertise. …”

This is important for investors to understand!


Broker? Adviser? And What’s the Difference?

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

NYT February 17th, 2010

“THE Great Recession has intensified a long-running debate: who is better able to look out for your money, a broker or an independent adviser? … At the center of the discussion are business practices and regulatory guidelines that are rarely understood by the client and often blurred in practice. Brokers are governed by the “suitability rule,” which requires them to have “reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable,” according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Registered financial advisers are supposed to adhere to a higher standard — “fiduciary responsibility,” an ethical and legal requirement that the investor’s best interest comes first, not the adviser’s own financial gain….”

I finally found a way to help investors understand the implications.  I work very hard to help investors know the right questions to ask to get to some kind of clarity around this, in essence it can come down to three questions, 1) How are they paid? By you or their firm, and is their any bias driven by commissions on financial products, bonus or quotas from their employer? 2) Do they have a fiduciary resonsibility all the time or not? 3) What is their investment philosophy, active, passive or rational & efficient or some combination.  After these hurdles, then chemistry, service etc..are the most important assuming all have expertise and access to the full range of investments.  For Plan Sponsors, a simple question is to ask if they are bonded, not the plan, but the advisor.  As a Fiduciary, they need to have a bond to cover the plans.  This is the way to determine if your plan’s advisor is truly in the boat the with y ou!


6 Ways Employers Will Change 401(k)s in 2010

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

US News & World Report

February 13, 2010

Employers plan to get more involved in their 401(k) plans in 2010. The trend of employers automatically signing their workers up for retirement accounts is expected to continue this year. Many companies will also attempt to steer their employees into more appropriate investments, according to a new survey by Hewitt Associates, a human resources consulting firm. “They are restoring their matching contributions and offering features and tools that push workers to save more throughout their working years,” says Pamela Hess, Hewitt’s director of retirement research. Here are six ways companies plan to update their 401(k) plans in 2010.

More from USNews.com:

7 Reasons Job Hoppers Are Worse Off in Retirement

America’s Best Affordable Places to Retire

Social Security Administration Sees Stars

Automatic enrollment.

Automatic escalation and rebalancing.

More investment guidance.

Add a Roth 401(k).

Offer annuities.

Resume the 401(k) match.

There you have it.  Read the excellent article for the full scoop!


More Common Sense from Jack Bogle

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Morningstar 2/4/10

“…Whether you’re an indexer or not, it’s filled with simple, powerful advice that can help improve your odds of long-term financial success. Here are some of its more important lessons, as well as a couple of points where you might dare to differ from St. Jack. 

Set Reasonable Expectations
Too many investors assume past trends will continue. Bogle stresses portfolio decisions should be based on not the market’s historic returns, but rather the sources of those results. For bonds, their current yield gives you a good idea of future returns. With stocks, returns can be broken down into investment return, or the dividend yield plus earnings growth rate, and speculative return, or changes in what investors are willing to pay for $1 of earnings.

 Bogle’s revised expectations indicate stocks may be a better deal. With the 10-year Treasury yielding around 3.5%, people flocking to fixed income are bound to be disappointed. Meanwhile, Bogle guesses, “that from our current levels some combination of slightly higher earnings growth and/or slightly higher P/Es and/or a swift recovery of corporate dividends could bring the nominal return on equities–to between 7% and 10% during the decade ending in 2019.”

 It’s the Costs, Stupid

Some people lump Bogle with academics and investors who posit the market is efficient. Bogle doesn’t spend much time arguing about market efficiency, though. To him, costs trump all. He contends the logic is irrefutable: Active and passive investors together make up the market; active investors incur more fees and transaction costs; so on average, passive investors must earn a higher return.

Even if you don’t follow Bogle’s logic all the way to his conclusion that investors hoping to beat the market with actively managed funds “are leaning on a weak reed,” it’s hard to argue with the strong case he makes against high fees. The price you pay is the one thing you can control. Don’t ignore it.

 Set the Bar High for Active Funds
Ironically, the apostle of index funds laid out some good criteria for choosing actively managed funds. Bogle thinks the pursuit of winning funds is futile but is resigned to the fact that people will continue to do it anyway. So, he laid out a few simple rules for fund selection: Choose low-cost funds; don’t chase hot returns or managers; look for consistency, tax efficiency, and evidence of risk control; beware of funds with big asset bases; keep your portfolio small and simple; and invest for the long term. …” 

Timeless advice for individuals and company retirement plans.


The Fiduciary Duty to Avoid Conflicts of Interest in Selecting Plan Service Providers

Friday, February 5th, 2010

A White Paper  For 401 k Plan Sponsors by C. Frederick Reish and Joseph C. Faucher

February 2009

This white paper provides an excellent overview of explaining who is a  fiduciary and what their fundamental duties are.  Then it goes on to show a number of examples of how these simple ideas can become very murky in practice.  It is not always clear where the land mines are and there are real risks to plan sponsors for not knowing.  The laws are clear that ignorance is no defense.  It doesn’t matter what a plan sponsor knows, it is what they should know that matters.


Hoping that Bigger Really Means Better

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Barrons January 11, 2010

“Passive-Aggressive Giant

More than doubling in size via its Barclay’s (iShares ETFs) purchase, BlackRock sees some of its best opportunities in wooing more reail investors to its passive and active funds.

Blackrock : Before and after the merger

Before – Actively managed 93%, after 51%, Passively managed 7%, after 49%.  What does Blackrock know?  That the smart money is incorporating more passive etfs and index funds into their portfolios.  Institutional and Individual.  What does your portfolio look like?  Read this blog post to see what I learned at the Superbowl of Indexing Conference from Gus Sauter, Vanguard’s Chief Investment Officer on the optimal mix of active and indexes….


What The Past Can’t Tell Investors

Friday, February 5th, 2010

WSJ January 3, 2010

“A STOCK that builds momentum in one year often carries it over into the next. Might that momentum effect work for the overall stock market?  Stocks surged in the last nine months of 2009. But the market’s performance in one year can’t predict the next, the data show.

It’s an especially tantalizing prospect right now, after the market’s surge over the last nine months of 2009. Investors would love to see that trend continue into this year. Unfortunately, though, there is precious little statistical support for it.

Consider the yearly returns of the Dow Jones industrial average since 1896, the year the index was created. The Dow rose in 73 of those years. And in the year after each of those climbs, it rose 64 percent of the time. That’s statistically indistinguishable from the 65 percent frequency with which the Dow rose after years when the index fell.

These results suggest that the market’s performance in 2009 doesn’t increase the probability of a net gain in 2010. (The good news, of course, is that high frequency of yearly gains. That means you’re likely to make money if you buy and hold a broad portfolio of stocks over the long term.) …

“We can be comforted by the fact that reasonably efficient markets always base their level on anticipated future returns,” he added, “and do not include history in the calculation.”

One exception to this general pattern involves the relative performance of small-capitalization stocks, which over the last 80 years have shown some modest persistence from year to year. That makes sense, because small caps are the market’s least efficient sector, and it therefore takes longer for their prices to adjust to new information….”

Read the whole article, it does a good job of explaining why trends and patterns don’t hold up and why market timing is virtually impossible with precision. This article was published on January 3, after February 4th, I think the point is underscored that market moves are unpredictable.


Shift From Commissions to Fees Has Benefits for Fund Investors

Friday, February 5th, 2010

WSJ February 1, 2010

 

“Over the past 15 or 20 years, advisers have started charging annual fees—frequently around 1% to 2% of assets— rather than taking commissions on individual transactions. The motive was simple: Securities firms realized they could bring in a steady stream of income while avoiding regulatory concerns about running up commissions in investors’ accounts. And some advisers have been leaving brokerages to join the ranks of independent fee-only financial advisers.

These fee arrangements aren’t necessarily cheaper for investors, but there are other important benefits:

• Fewer conflicts of interest for the advisers, who used to have significant financial incentives to push one fund over another or to recommend a change in an investor’s portfolio.

• More transparency about adviser fees and fund expenses. In the past, adviser compensation was typically built into mutual-fund shares—with those charges subtracted either at the time of purchase, year after year or upon a sale.

• A wider variety of funds for an adviser to work with. Fund companies used to offer either commissioned, or “load,” funds for securities-firm clients or “no load” funds for do-it-yourself investors, but usually not both. So, investors usually ended up working with one type of company and holding one type of fund. Now, fee-paid advisers and their clients are using, side by side, traditional no-load funds and load funds on which the commissions are waived.”

Just because a broker is “fee-based” (which means at best they can swith hats between a suitability standard and fiduciary standard or at worse charge both fees and commissions) or even fee-only, does not mean they are held to a fiduciary standard.  Currenly, only Registered Investment Advisors are held to a fiduciary standard, these fine distinctions are easily lost (because it is confusing, especially in the case of dually registered investment advisors) but it should be of major concern to the individual investor.  This is the one of the major battles going on right now within financial regulatory reform.  Most investors don’t even know the right questions to ask and a skilled sales person (broker) can skillfully get around the implications.

 


With Fund Managers, Past Is No Predictor for Future

Friday, February 5th, 2010

WSJ February 1, 2010

“New studies cast doubt on whether fund-manager skill and past performance are good gauges of future results.

Advisor Perspectives, an e-newsletter for financial advisers, in December published a study suggesting that investment research firm predictive value. It also found that many five-star-rated funds were likely to underperform their peers.

Robert Huebscher, chief executive of Advisor Perspectives, randomly selected a fund with a particular rating, and then looked at how it fared against randomly selected funds with lower-star ratings from the third quarter of 2006 through the third quarter of 2009. He found many cases where the lower-rated funds were more likely to outperform those with higher ratings.

Yet, despite those findings, “the public pour money into funds that get higher ratings,” Mr. Huebscher says.

The perils of banking of past performance are clear to see. Bill Miller, manager of Legg Mason Capital Management Value Fund (trading symbol: LMVTX), posted an industry-record streak of beating his benchmark for 15 straight years. But investors joining the fund in early 2007 based on that record would have suffered a 6.7% loss that year, followed by a whopping 55% decline in 2008. Further illustrating that past performance isn’t a reliable guide, the fund was up almost 41% last year.”

If investors use the Morningstar five star funds as their sole rationale for picking a fund, they are employing a strategy of performance chasing. This is not an effective strategy as the article goes on to explain why.


You Converted to a Roth; What About the Taxes?

Friday, February 5th, 2010

WSJ January 30, 2010

“…So, even though you technically have until next April to decide when to pay the tax, it makes sense to make that decision early.  One other note: Conversion income might drive up your state income tax as well, which you could check with a local accountant.”

Paying taxes on roth conversions isn’t clear so read this article to see your options to avoid penalties.